| Research | Community | Analysts | Teleconferences | Events | Consumer Data | Business Data | Executive Programs | Consulting | About Forrester |
Displaying results 1-25 of 36 results
by Richard Fichera, February 8, 2005
With the introduction of Fujitsu FlexFrame offering for SAP, Forrester predicted that competing vendors would quickly follow suit.1 In announcing IBM Dynamic Infrastructure for mySAP Business Suite, IBM joins Fujitsu in offering a set of infrastructure . . .
by Frank E. Gillett, January 20, 2005
Hype about grid technology has grown, with new standards bodies and informational Web sites joining grid pioneers from the late 1990s. Grid has many meanings and claimed benefits, so how are users supposed to figure out what it means for them? Forrester . . .
by Galen Schreck, September 2, 2004
VERITAS Software has announced that it will acquire KVS in an all-cash transaction worth $225 million. KVS has built a successful business fueled by firms' need to maintain regulatory compliance while reducing overall storage costs. On September 30, KVS' . . .
by Galen Schreck, July 19, 2004
VERITAS has announced plans to acquire privately-held Invio in a deal worth $35 million — VERITAS' fourth utility computing-related acquisition since it began building its portfolio with Jareva and Precise in December 2002. Today, Invio markets an extensible . . .
by Galen Schreck, Frank E. Gillett, June 25, 2004
Forrester surveyed 149 US firms about their IT priorities for this year and beyond. The majority still say that their top short-term priority is reducing the cost of IT. When asked about future plans for 2005, lowering business and IT labor costs takes . . .
by Richard Fichera, January 26, 2004
Current VERITAS customers should definitely continue to monitor the company¿s progress, and when the program becomes more clearly instantiated in product and service offerings, VERITAS could emerge as a top-tier competitor for many enterprise applications
by Richard Fichera, November 26, 2003
IBM¿s announcement of Tivoli Intelligent ThinkDynamic Orchestrator and Provisioning Manager introduces a radical change into the competitive landscape surrounding organic IT, particularly the ability to provide policy-based automation of applications.
by Colin Rankine, Bill Martorelli, July 28, 2003
The problems inherent in variable-price service delivery are not intractable if considerable care is taken in devising measures that align the interests of customer and service provider.
by Frank E. Gillett, Ted Schadler, June 2, 2003
Recent product announcements, strategy updates, and an important acquisition make it clear that IBM is serious about Organic IT. Firms should check out IBM's products and services for on demand assessments but put business transformation where it belongs . . .
Small Buy, Big Impact: IBM Buys Think Dynamicsby Laura Koetzle, Galen Schreck, Charles Rutstein, Frank E. Gillett, May 16, 2003
With its acquisition of Think Dynamics, IBM significantly bolsters the On Demand story. Once the new products are integrated, IBM will offer On Demand buyers a credible choice between products and services, plus new heterogeneous capabilities for complex . . .
by Bill Martorelli, May 5, 2003
IBM's On Demand agenda has emerged as a unifying strategy across the entire spectrum of IBM products and services, manifestations of which will range from storage and servers through high-end business process and consulting services.
by Bill Martorelli, March 27, 2003
IBM's emerging On Demand approach to outsourcing carries some risk. Nevertheless, the potential value is significant: the fixed-cost portion typically represents two-thirds or more of an IT organization's total spending.
by Thomas Mendel, Ph.D., November 19, 2002
by Bill Martorelli, November 18, 2002
IBM's $10 billion investment in utility-based On Demand computing strategy is, like the principal utility-based strategies of its rivals, long on vision and short on coherence. Nevertheless, IBM customers are achieving benefits using constituent parts.
by Thomas Mendel, Ph.D., November 7, 2002
Vendors in the utility computing space must follow up their initial announcements with (1) clear messages about how their approach differs, (2) product road maps that show when functionality will be available and (3) ROI calculations.
by Will Cappelli, November 6, 2002
There is no question that the move from intradomain to interdomain optimization will indeed reduce inefficiencies. Nonetheless, expectations should not be raised too high.
by Jean-Pierre Garbani, November 6, 2002
While the concept of utility computing is certainly appealing, today's implementations are simply not worth the complexity and cost involved. Better results can be achieved by implementing manual management processes.
by Mike Gilpin, Richard Fichera, November 5, 2002
As the e-business On Demand strategy is implemented in the next few years, Giga expects IBM to be a leading player in the market for these more flexible, modular, self-managing service-oriented platforms.
by Ted Schadler, Charles Rutstein, October 30, 2002
Today, IBM CEO Sam Palmisano announced IBM's new strategy to support customers with "on-demand infrastructure." Forrester applauds IBM's commitment to transform infrastructure pricing to help companies better match IT investment to business returns.
by Will Cappelli, October 23, 2002
Equitable cost allocation is effectively a myth, given the current state of IT infrastructures and application portfolios, no matter how that allocation is executed.
by Will Cappelli, October 16, 2002
Recently, Terraspring has begun to strike alliances with a number of Hewlett-Packard's (HP) competitors, in particular with IBM, and there is some concern that Terraspring's new relationships could undermine the viability of HP's offering.
by Will Cappelli, September 30, 2002
It is possible to associate a rated unit with a user's consumption and cut a bill reflecting the number of units generated during a specific period. However, Giga believes such as bill is not economically meaningful to either the buyer or the seller.
by Will Cappelli, September 26, 2002
One of the claims made by vendors of utility computing enabling software is that capacity planning for such environments is comparatively easy. Unfortunately, this argument is fallacious.
by Adria Ferguson, August 8, 2002
Utility computing is an offering that could benefit many organizations, especially companies with low server utilization rates, high seasonality and variable capacity demands.
by Joel Yaffe, July 9, 2002
Although the service offering is touted as a utility, the reality is somewhat less utopian; contract terms for the offering require minimum usage commitments and a term length of at least 12 months.
Footer links (2 lists of links) |